{"id":13084,"date":"2023-12-01T04:25:10","date_gmt":"2023-12-01T03:25:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aboutriver.com\/?p=13084"},"modified":"2023-12-01T04:25:10","modified_gmt":"2023-12-01T03:25:10","slug":"whats-going-on-with-the-mississippi-river","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aboutriver.com\/whats-going-on-with-the-mississippi-river\/","title":{"rendered":"What’s Going On With The Mississippi River"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Mississippi River is the largest and longest in the United States and the fourth longest in the world. It flows through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi and Louisiana, and is part of a vast network of tributaries and drains about 40% of the continental United States. Along with serving as a crucial economic corridor for commerce and trade, the river itself provides an abundance of recreational opportunities, from fishing and hunting to rafting and sightseeing. <\/p>\n

A recent survey of the area found fish populations were in decline in about half of the states the Mississippi runs through, and the overall health of the river was in decline. Studies show that rising temperatures, sedimentation, runoff from farms, and waste from factories are degrading the water quality of the river. The US Geological Survey indicates in those states where fish populations were found to be declining, the number of species decreased by an average of 29%; this was attributed to increased sedimentation and water temperature. The decline in water quality is having a cascading negative effect on other species that rely on the Mississippi River, such as birds and small mammals. <\/p>\n

These findings call into question the current methods of management and policy use in the area. Dr. Michael Smith, PhD., Director of Natural Resources at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, believes that the approach has not adequately taken into consideration potential harmonious interactions between different species living in the river. Smith suggests that rather than simply trying to identify problems, policy makers should look at ways of managing the river that emphasize the value of interconnectedness among the various aquatic and land animal life-forms.<\/p>\n

Moreover, Dr. Smith firmly believes that by allowing for a shift in focus from simply regulating the river to restoring it, we could see a substantial improvement in the overall health of the Mississippi. To this end, Smith proposes a comprehensive, ecosystem-level approach to restoring the river, which would involve removing pollutants from the river’s channel, restoring nutrient cycles, protecting the riparian landscape, reintroducing native species, and conserving habitat. <\/p>\n