{"id":13994,"date":"2023-12-18T14:05:19","date_gmt":"2023-12-18T13:05:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aboutriver.com\/?p=13994"},"modified":"2023-12-18T14:05:19","modified_gmt":"2023-12-18T13:05:19","slug":"why-mississippi-river-drying-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aboutriver.com\/why-mississippi-river-drying-up\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Mississippi River Drying Up"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Background Information<\/h2>\n

The Mississippi River is one of the world’s longest rivers, stretching from the upper Midwest to the Gulf of Mexico, and is the lifeblood of the environment, wildlife and communities of the region. It is a source of drinking water for 15 million people, it supports agriculture, fuels industry and recreation, and it forms the gateway for efficient transportation of goods by ships. Yet, in recent years, the Mississippi River has befallen a dry spell.
\nThe reason for this dry spell is a complex mix of man-made and natural causes. In the Upper Mississippi, a long-term warming trend has resulted in greater evaporation from the nation’s largest water body and less precipitation. Further downstream, the effects of climate change and more frequent droughts are further drying up the waters. On the flip side, man-made modifications of the river, such as dams and locks, have changed the way the river works, reducing its flow and levels, and resulting in diminished sedimentation that form wetlands, marshes and floodplains.<\/p>\n

Relevant Data and Perspectives from Experts<\/h2>\n

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) cites long-term trends of reduced snowpack and runoff in the Midwest, as well as earlier peak runoff times, as leading contributors to decreased flows in the Mississippi River. The decreased flows have been more pronounced in the South and Middle sections of the river. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) notes that, since the mid-1900s, the average annual flow has decreased by 18%.
\nEnvironmental scientists note that drought is only one of the factors affecting river flow in the Midwest; snow and changing water use priorities, among other associated factors, are causing additional deficits of water in the Upper Mississippi. In the Lower Mississippi, climate change is the dominant force behind decreasing river flows. In particular, higher temperatures are leading to increased evaporation from the river, in addition to it being diverted for agricultural and industrial purposes, leading to water deficits downstream.<\/p>\n

Insight and Analysis<\/h2>\n

The drying up of the Mississippi River is concerning for several reasons. Despite recent attention being focused on the effects of climate change, the effects of river modifications and changing water use priorities have been largely overlooked. The decrease in river flow affects the ecology of the region, as well as the natural resources that the river and its tributaries support.
\nWater levels are critical for navigation, commerce, and recreation. In 2018, industry groups and the USACE reported disruption in freight shipping due to low water levels. Navigation restrictions were measured based on the between the navigation pool’s “shock points of 12 feet and 9 feet (3.66 m and 2.75 m) at St. Louis.” There is evidence to suggest that the USACE’s management of their dams and releases is not helping the situation much, as they are not fully taking into account upstream and downstream water levels.<\/p>\n

Implications for Sustainability<\/h2>\n

The lack of attention given to the effects of changing water use priorities, combined with the effects of natural drought and man-made modifications of the river, has significantly worrying implications for the future sustainability of the Mississippi River. Despite the efforts of environmental groups and industry to come up with solutions to support water levels in the long term, the magnitude of the situation cannot be understated.
\nThe USACE manages many of the resources allocated to support water flow, including the proposal of barge lock extensions at major river junctions. However, in spite of these measures, the USACE has argued that more needs to be done: they propose more sustained, systemic infrastructure improvement projects, noting that “improvements to locks and dams need to be balanced with dredging, bank stabilization and other efforts to reduce sediment in the river.” <\/p>\n

Social Implications<\/h2>\n