{"id":9360,"date":"2024-01-01T14:25:08","date_gmt":"2024-01-01T13:25:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aboutriver.com\/?p=9360"},"modified":"2024-01-01T14:25:08","modified_gmt":"2024-01-01T13:25:08","slug":"does-the-mississippi-river-change-the-state-line","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aboutriver.com\/does-the-mississippi-river-change-the-state-line\/","title":{"rendered":"Does The Mississippi River Change The State Line"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Mississippi River plays an important part in the history and culture of the United States. We all know that the Mississippi River has been utilized for commerce, transportation, and even recreation, however, few people realize that the Mississippi River also plays an important role in the State lines of the United States. This article will take a closer look at how the Mississippi River has changed the state line between Mississippi and Louisiana.<\/p>\n

In 1763 the Treaty of Paris was signed, officially ending the French and Indian War. As part of the treaty, the French ceded all its claims to territory east of the Mississippi River, including what would become the state of Mississippi. This established the state line as the course of the river. This boundary is still used today by many states in the Middle East.<\/p>\n

Fast forward to 1811, when the citizens of Mississippi voted to become a separate state. This vote established Mississippi’s official western boundary at the Mississippi River. Despite this action, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the boundary between Mississippi and Louisiana was not based on the Mississippi River, but instead, part of the boundary was based on the location of an old fort. This ruling was not overturned until 1833, when the Supreme Court ruled that the boundary should have been determined by the course of the river.<\/p>\n

Once the boundary was fixed, the US government began to survey the area. These surveys noted that the course of the river had changed in certain areas, and this resulted in significant alterations to the state line. In some cases, entire towns or villages had been moved a few feet or miles to the other side of the river, and this resulted in a dispute as to which state they were part of. The Supreme Court ultimately decided that such areas should remain as part of the state in which they had originally been included.<\/p>\n